Secciones

The Non-Green Energy and Jobs Boom.

Drill, drill, drill = jobs, jobs, jobs in North Dakota


From today's WSJ staff editorial:

"The ironies here are richer than the shale deposits in North Dakota's Bakken formation. While Washington has tried to force-feed renewable energy with tens of billions in special subsidies, oil and natural gas production has boomed thanks to private investment. And while renewable technology breakthroughs never seem to arrive, horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have revolutionized oil and gas extraction—with no Energy Department loan guarantees needed.

The oil and gas rush has led to a jobs boom. North Dakota has the nation's lowest jobless rate, at 3.5%, and the state now has some 200 rigs pumping 440,000 barrels of oil a day, four times the amount in 2006 (see chart above). The state reports more than 16,000 current job openings, and places like Williston have become meccas for workers seeking jobs that often pay more than $100,000 a year.

Or take production in Pennsylvania's Marcellus shale formation, which the state Department of Labor and Industry says created 18,000 new jobs in the first half of 2011. Some 214,000 jobs are now tied to a natural gas industry that barely existed in the Keystone State a decade ago. Energy firms are also rushing to develop the Utica shale in eastern Ohio, and they are expanding operations in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, among other places. 

Yet earlier this month the Interior Department released a new five-year plan that puts most of the Outer Continental Shelf off-limits for oil drilling. And the Administration has delayed for at least another year the Keystone XL pipeline that is shovel-ready to create 20,000 new direct, pipeline-related jobs.

The Office of Natural Resources Revenue recently noted that federal revenue from offshore bonus bids (from lease sales) in fiscal 2011 was merely $36 million—down from $9.5 billion in fiscal 2008. The Obama Administration has managed the nearly impossible feat of turning energy policy into a money loser, pouring taxpayer dollars into green-energy busts like Solyndra. The Washington Post reported in September that Mr. Obama's $38.6 billion green loan program had created a mere 3,500 jobs over two years. He had predicted it would "save or create" 65,000. 

Mr. Obama nonetheless keeps talking about "green jobs" as if repetition will conjure them. He'd do more for the economy if he dropped the ideological illusions and embraced the job-creating, wealth-producing reality of domestic fossil fuels."


2 comentarios:

  1. Muy interesante esta entrada Manuel. Y sí, es verdad que hay ciertos mitos entorno a la nueva revolución industrial, la de las energías verdes (échale una ojeada al último libro de Rifkin). Parece más un estereotipo o moda que los políticos gustan de acunar en benificio propio, ahí está el caso de Mr.Obama que parece que no acierta ni una últimamente.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. El blog de Mark Perry es muy interesante y suele enlazar muy buenos artículos.
    Lo peor de lo que están haciendo ahora con las energías verdes o renovables es que pueden lastrar su crecimiento futuro, cuando realmente sean competitivas y rentables.
    Un saludo y gracias por tu comentario.

    ResponderEliminar